Sunday, August 19, 2012

Severn Barrage resurrection ....... again

So one time Labour minister Peter Hain has presented redrawn plans for the Severn Barrage to David Cameron, who has instructed his officials to study them closely. Promoted as a £30bn investment by the sovereign wealth funds of Kuwait and Qatar, amongst others, it would give a welcome kick start to the UK economy at little capital cost to the UK. It would also help the UK to meet challenging targets for carbon emissions and begin to resolve the looming energy crisis as existing power stations are retired.

Reaching across the Bristol Channel from Lavernack Point, south of Cardiff, to west of Weston-super-Mare it would create 20,000 or so jobs during construction and generate power equivalent to three nuclear power stations or 2,500 off-shore wind turbines. It might also carry road and rail links.

Construction could start as early as 2014, so what's stopping it? Once again the impact on mudflats and wild life will feature strongly; and quite rightly so. No doubt MP Steve Webb will argue against it on the same grounds that he argues against nuclear, i.e. that it cannot meet the demand for power because it will take too long to build. That argument is self-fulfilling of course because the longer people like him defer decisions the more likely it is to be true.

And what of the people of Thornbury? I am confident that this week's issue of Thornbury Gazette will front page the opposition of one local group or another.

PS Off-topic perhaps but worth observing that politicians, our own included, are adept at deferring decisions in order to delay capital investment. How do they do it? Simple! Just run with the hare and hunt with the hounds, witness the excruciatingly slow progress deciding on Frenchay or Southmead as the site for a new hospital.

Thursday, July 19, 2012

Putting the heart back into Thornbury

I happen to think that Thornbury needs a larger and more sustainable population if we are to support a thriving town centre and one day to benefit from many of the facilities enjoyed by larger communities. If the majority think otherwise then we must all live with the consequences of that decision.

However, I find it bizarre that the current debate centres almost exclusively on which green space should be preserved rather than on broader environmental considerations. Criteria should include ease of access to the High Street. How do we encourage folk in the new homes to walk rather than use their cars? Surely an environmentally responsible Thornbury should be discouraging folk from burning more fuel and increasing pressure on our already over-stretched parking? Surely a commercially viable Thornbury should discourage them from getting into their cars and heading off to The Mall where the parking is easier?

If we decide to build more homes let’s build them as close to the High Street as possible. Let’s put the heart back into Thornbury.