Saturday, September 01, 2012

St Mary Centre Thornbury for sale?

Lots of work going on down in St Mary Centre. New railings here, coats of paint there. Does this mean that Peer Group are tarting it up for a quick sale?

Perhaps it's just routine renovation to keep the empty shops lettable and to generate more rent. But what if Peer Group have decided that their business model isn't working in Thornbury any more?

Their strategy is:

" .... to secure growth through the asset management of the existing portfolio and the acquisition of carefully chosen new investment and development opportunities."

So do they view the Centre as an appreciating capital asset or as a revenue stream from lettings? If they've lost confidence in future lettings then I wouldn't be surprised to see a swift sale as they seek to rescue whatever gains they've made.

If my surmise is correct it will be interesting to see who buys them out - Americans, Germans, Chinese or Arabs.

Not all bad news if the new owners were to value their holding by the NPV of its future rental income because they might then have a stronger incentive to eliminate empty premises by offering keener rents.

Let's see what happens.

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Fury at solar roof blot in Castle Street

So "furious neighbours of a cottager who put solar panels up on his roof in the middle of Thornbury's heritage trail have blasted his act of visual vandalism" (Thornbury Gazette, Thursday, August 23, 2012, page 4)

Surely the architectural merit of Castle Street's skyline is at least as badly damaged by the neighbours, many in listed buildings, who adorn their chimneys with unsightly aerials? When South Gloucestershire Council's planning bosses and Thornbury Town Council meet to discuss the matter I hope they give some thought to the unintended consequences of a decision which gave more weight to the negative visual impact than to the environmental benefit.

Aerials certainly have a negative visual impact but no environmental benefit whatsoever. Once the solar panels go, aerials must go. And what next? Oh yes, look at the hideous street lights which are totally inappropriate for the setting. Anyone for Victorian gas lighting?

The only certainty is that council taxpayers will end up footing the bills for hearings, actions and compensation?